Historical Romance, My
Love - by Lily Dalton
Over the last year,
I’ve participated in some booksignings. I’m friendly, and love talking to
people but there’s one comment about historicals that I’ve heard a good handful
of times, and it always makes me want to put my head down on the table and cry.
**drum roll**
“This looks like
something my grandma would have loved.”
Ouch. Mind you, I love
grandmas. I also hope they enjoy my books. But I think there’s an unfortunate
belief by many that historical novels are an old fashioned choice, unchanged
over the previous decades as far as style and content, and packed page to page with
purple prose. That fear was confirmed last year when I happened to meet a Ph.D.
professor of literature who teaches at a national university. She told me one
of the classes she taught covered romances as a form of literature. How
wonderful, I thought, and asked what historicals were on the syllabus. I
expected to hear names like Sherry Thomas or Sarah MacLean or Eloisa James.
Her answer: Kathleen
Woodiwiss’ Shanna. What?
Don’t get me wrong. I
love the book myself. It’s a classic. But I was disappointed to hear that a
book published in 1977 was being held up as a representation of historical romance
in the year 2013, as if nothing along the way had changed. Keep in mind I have
a bookshelf full of vintage romances that I love and often reread. But just as
the world has transformed in three and a half decades, so has historical
romance. Yet the evolution of the genre has kept me engaged.
Still, one can’t deny
that at its core, so much about the historical genre remains the same. The original
plot devices continue to draw me in. Why do I love them so much? Aside from the
simple joy of being transported across time, I love, love, LOVE, reading
stories about exceptional women facing and overcoming challenges, and finding
love with an uncommonly heroic, sexy
man along the way. Though it’s easy to look back at history through a very
rose-colored, romantic lens, reality wasn’t that kind. People married for
survival. To continue bloodlines. To bolster fortunes. To continue dynasties. Marriage,
under those circumstances, didn’t lead to many happily-ever-afters. Truly
passionate and enduring love matches had to have been very rare.
That’s why it’s magic
for me to immerse in that world, and imagine the circumstances of how such an
unlikely and unexpected love might begin and unfold.
What about you? Do you
love historical romances? If so, what differences do you see between
historicals published now and those published 2-3 decades ago? Did you read
historicals at one time and have since given them up? If so, spill the details,
and tell us why.
Yes please, this looks amazing.
ReplyDeletemarypres(AT)gmail(DOT)com
I love HR. That is mainly the genre that I read besides CR which isn't as much as my HR books. I think my CR books take up 1/5 of all my HR books. I haven't read HR from a long time ago yet...I just started with HR a few years ago and haven't gotten that far in my author searching yet.
ReplyDeletepaaj(_)xyooj(at)yahoo(dot)com